<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>A Second Opinion &#187; newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/tag/newspapers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl</link>
	<description>a spectator sees more than a player</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 10:16:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times’ R&amp;D Lab has built a tool that explores the life stories take in the social space</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/726</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/726#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 16:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Megan Garber Some of the most exciting work taking place in The New York Times building is being done on the 28th floor, in the paper’s Research and Development Lab. The group serves essentially as a skunkworks project for a news institution that stands to benefit, financially and otherwise, from creative thinking; as Michael Zimbalist, the Times’ [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/726/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The app divide between casual readers and news junkies</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/719</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/719#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Andrew Phelps Can a single app please both casual news readers and news junkies? That’s the question I found myself asking upon rereading that report from a couple weeks ago on iPad users’ reactions to The Daily. The report was put together by knowDigital, a division of market-research firm Coleman Insights, which asked more than 40 iPad owners [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/719/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the NYT Lincoln Deal: It&#8217;s About Dollars, Traffic and Conversion</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/716</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apr 7, 2011 So, it looks like an intriguing deal. Ford Motors’ Lincoln is subsidizing 100,000 new NYT digital subscriptions. Well, it is an intriguing deal, but it’s more nuanced than it seems, and in that nuance, we see some of the next models for how the digital circulation business and the digital ad business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/716/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The newsonomics of the digital cafeteria</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/714</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/714#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Ken Doctor Here’s how newspapers sell what they do to would-be readers. You can get the whole paper, now sometimes including digital access. We’ll sell you Sunday only, or the weekend, or 7-day, but you have to take our whole paper. That’s what we sell; that’s our one-size-fits-all product. It fit your grandparents and your parents, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/714/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing’s new iPad app is a newspaper in disguise</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/711</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Damon KiesowPublished Apr. 11, 2011 Updated Apr. 12, 2011 Microsoft’s new Bing iPad app, released Thursday, does more than search — it begins to remake the newspaper experience in digital form. The app is not being marketed as a news platform, but journalists should consider it one because it offers a great local information utility for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/711/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials Still Prefer Newspapers for Political News</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/699</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/699#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 08:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Jim O&#8217;Sullivan Thursday, March 31, 2011 Reports of the demise of newspapers may be greatly exaggerated. According to a new Harvard study, the denizens of the digital age &#8212; 18-to-29-year-olds &#8212; would prefer to get most of their political news about the next presidential campaign from &#8212; believe it or not &#8212; major national newspapers....more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/699/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free weeklies turned online only by publisher</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/682</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/682#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Helen Lambourne A regional publisher which has scrapped the printing of most of its weekly freesheets and transformed them into e-editions says it has seen a 50pc increase in web traffic in three months.&#8230;more]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/682/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NYT Pay Plan’s Most Dangerous Foe: Perception</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/679</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/679#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staci D. Kramer Mar 27, 2011 By now, we were supposed to have clarity about how The New York Times will use a meter to create a digital subscription revenue stream. After all, the plan went into effect in Canada March 17 and is supposed to start rolling out in the United States and globally Monday [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/679/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The newsonomics of Sunday paper/tablet subscriptions</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/674</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/674#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 08:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywalls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By Ken Doctor Digital news business models are playing out on pool tables these days. Break the balls and you have no idea where they’re going or how they’ll impact each other. We’ve got paid content models of varying kinds. We’ve got the new combining “free world” of AOL/Huffington Post+ taking aim at the emerging paid world. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/674/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYT Posts Articles on Twitter; Asks Others Not to Notice</title>
		<link>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/669</link>
		<comments>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/669#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>theesp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[circulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[businessmodels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.asecondopinion.nl/?p=669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Erik Sass Huh?  The New York Times is clearly struggling with the whole social media angle of its new online pay-wall &#8212; or rather, trying to have its online cake and eat it too. On one hand, the NYT wants heavy users to pay for access to online content, shelling out $15 per month for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.asecondopinion.nl/archives/669/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

